Campus Watch at Work
Campus Watch, a right-wing site dedicated to attacking Middle East Studies, is proud as punch because they have "struck a blow against Islamic extremism." Off in the "Survey of Institutions" corner of their web site, they have also helpfully posted the relevant correspondence. The issue was the fact that this CMENAS web site (perpetually under construction, btw) linked to an Islamic extremist page in its Islam section.
Here is my shorthand version of the correspondence:
From CW to Dr. Michael Bonner:
"Your web site links to Islamic extremists. Were you aware of this, and do you endorse this site?"
Dr. Michael Bonner to CW:
"I'm actually not in charge any more, but I sent your message to the person who is. We don't endorse Islamic extremism, and will look into this."
Michigan's Michael Fahy to CW:
"Thanks for pointing out that link. It was the result of insufficient oversight, and has been removed. We understand your concerns, and assure you we do not endorse Islamic extremism"
CW to U of M President:
"Your CMENAS used federal money to link to an Islamic extremist site. We contacted Michael Bonner, who 'disclaimed any knowledge' (exact quote in letter). They removed the link and pleaded insufficient oversight. We don't believe that's enough, and demand a complete investigation to see what else they are spreading."
Does anyone else feel that certain people are trying to stir the pot to advance an agenda? This is especially interesting because in the past, Campus Watch has complained that Middle East Studies people gloss over Islamic extremism. Now, including them in information about Islam is held to be endorsing their views. I should also add that I have no idea how Michigan works, but around here a web site is often maintained as a low-level priority by a student worker or graduate assistant. If Michigan is the same, "insufficient oversight" is almost too grand a term to use here.
Here is my shorthand version of the correspondence:
From CW to Dr. Michael Bonner:
"Your web site links to Islamic extremists. Were you aware of this, and do you endorse this site?"
Dr. Michael Bonner to CW:
"I'm actually not in charge any more, but I sent your message to the person who is. We don't endorse Islamic extremism, and will look into this."
Michigan's Michael Fahy to CW:
"Thanks for pointing out that link. It was the result of insufficient oversight, and has been removed. We understand your concerns, and assure you we do not endorse Islamic extremism"
CW to U of M President:
"Your CMENAS used federal money to link to an Islamic extremist site. We contacted Michael Bonner, who 'disclaimed any knowledge' (exact quote in letter). They removed the link and pleaded insufficient oversight. We don't believe that's enough, and demand a complete investigation to see what else they are spreading."
Does anyone else feel that certain people are trying to stir the pot to advance an agenda? This is especially interesting because in the past, Campus Watch has complained that Middle East Studies people gloss over Islamic extremism. Now, including them in information about Islam is held to be endorsing their views. I should also add that I have no idea how Michigan works, but around here a web site is often maintained as a low-level priority by a student worker or graduate assistant. If Michigan is the same, "insufficient oversight" is almost too grand a term to use here.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home