Joshua Landis thinks Iraq will see
more Syria spillover than Lebanon:
In Iraq, the sects have found no peace and little acceptance of the
balance of power now being hammered out. Prime Minister Maliki is busy
building a Shiite dictatorship and pushing out the remaining centers of Sunni power left behind by the Americans in their doomed attempt to promote power-sharing.
Al-Qaida is rebuilding in Iraq to contest Shiite power. It probably has
the backing of a larger segment of the Sunni community that still chafes
from its loss of fortune following the US destruction of Saddam
Hussein’s regime. Unlike Lebanon, the various sects of Iraq have not
found a modus-vivendi. Relations between Kurds and Arabs in Iraq are
becoming more vexed as Kurdistan takes ever more steps to assert its
independence from Arab Iraq.
The Sunni-led attempt to depose Assad’s regime is sure to give a big
boost to Al-Qaida in Iraq as arms and men flow across the border and
find a refuge in Syria. Saudi, Turkish and Qatari support for Syria’s
Sunnis is also likely to turbo-charge passions in Iraq, as Sunnis feel
empowered to push back against Iranian influence and the Shiite hold on
power.
I think he's using the term "al-Qaida" too generously there and ignoring the extent of war-weariness in Iraq. I also wonder if Iraq currently has some shortage of weapons such that the cross-border flow would matter. However, he's right that the chances for conflict arising out of Iraqi politics are greater than one in Lebanon arising out of factional rivalry there. Again, what I'm worried about in Lebanon is an extension of the Syrian conflict to that country, rather than the development of an independent Lebanese conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment