I might use part of
this as a syllabus quote for my spring world history survey, HIS 106: Thinking Historically in a Global Age:
"Trying to understand international
affairs without knowing history is like trying to cook without knowing the
difference between flour and flounder. Not only does history provide the laboratory in which our basic theories
must be tested, it shapes the narratives different peoples tell themselves
about how they came to their present circumstances and how they regard their
relationship to others. How could one
hope to understand the Middle East without knowing about the Ottoman Empire,
the impact of colonialism, the role of Islam, the influence of European
anti-Semitism and Zionism, or the part played by the Cold War? Similarly, how could one grasp the current
complexities in Asia without understanding the prior relations between these
nations and the different ways that Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Japanese,
Pashtuns, Hindus, Muslims, and others understand and explain past events?
"But don't just memorize a lot of names and dates: seek out
teachers who can help you think about the past in sophisticated ways. Among other things, it's useful to know how
other societies see the past even if you don't agree with their interpretation,
so make sure you read histories written by citizens of other countries. And if you're studying in the United States, don't
just study 'Western Civilization.' The
world is a lot bigger than that."
No comments:
Post a Comment