The
New York Times does a great job
explaining the context of Israel's air strike in Syria targeting weapons it said were bound of Hizbullah:
Iran and Hezbollah have both backed President Bashar al-Assad in the
Syrian civil war, now in its third year. But as fighting in Syria
escalates, they also have a powerful interest in expediting the delivery
of advanced weapons to Hezbollah in case Mr. Assad loses his grip on
power and Syria ceases to be an effective channel for funneling weapons
from Iran...
In Lebanon, some analysts said they believed that a strong Hezbollah
could also emerge as a powerful ally for Mr. Assad if he is forced to
abandon Damascus, the Syrian capital, and take refuge in a rump
Iranian-backed state on the Syrian coast, a region that abuts the
Hezbollah-controlled northern Bekaa Valley...
An American official, who asked not to be identified because he was
discussing intelligence reports, said the targeted shipment consisted of
Iranian-made Fateh-110’s — a mobile, accurate, solid-fueled missile
that has the range to strike Tel Aviv and much of Israel from southern
Lebanon, and that represents a considerable improvement over the
liquid-fueled Scud missile. Two prominent Israeli defense analysts said
the shipment included Scud D’s, a missile that Syrians have developed
from Russian weapons with a range of up to 422 miles — long enough to
reach Eilat, in southernmost Israel, from Lebanon.
So what's the situation here? ;^)
ReplyDelete